The are only supposed to be two plastic pins -- on one opposite corners--- that is the way it was designedWow, that's alot of people with the exact same issue....... Very disheartening........
Dave
The are only supposed to be two plastic pins -- on one opposite corners--- that is the way it was designedWow, that's alot of people with the exact same issue....... Very disheartening........
Dave
Wait...... What......? I thought that was a mistake? It really is only meant to have 2? Then why does it have holes for 4?The are only supposed to be two plastic pins -- on one opposite corners--- that is the way it was designed
Yes, there are only supposed to be two of the pins in place just like it was when delivered. Some people use loosely fitted tie wraps.Wait...... What......? I thought that was a mistake? It really is only meant to have 2? Then why does it have holes for 4?
Dave
Yes, there are many people with the exact same issue. Lots of threads on it here and in the DJI forum. Tahoe_Ed has noted that DJI is aware and working on it, but as you may have read in other threads the problem has existed even before the P3 and also on the Inspire. The thought there is that if they can't fix it on the Inspire, they probably can't fix it on the much cheaper Phantom. I still hold out some hope however, though I dont really expect to ever have a 360 degree level horizon.Wow, that's alot of people with the exact same issue....... Very disheartening........
Dave
Ok I just removed the other 2, but again why are there 4 connection points? Does that actually affect anything if you used all 4?Yes, there are only supposed to be two of the pins in place just like it was when delivered. Some people use loosely fitted tie wraps.
From what I read in the forums, more than two can introduce jello in video. I have never tested it by adding more.Ok I just removed the other 2, but again why are there 4 connection points? Does that actually affect anything if you used all 4?
Dave
I had looked at this post a while back. Can't tell much from the video, but the narrative says that the poster's tilt problem is evident in the east/west direction and is intermittent. Not much to be gained from this observation to determine if the tilt is related to errors in the geomagnetic inclination value.Bud - if you have a chance, check out this post in one of the "tilt" threads:
http://www.phantompilots.com/thread...f-the-tilted-horizon.47326/page-4#post-459641
Ok so I'm not sure if I'm just a moron and missed it or its something that's different since the update but I think it's fixed. I started with the gimbal calibration, then the imu, and finished with doing the compass. As soon as I clicked the gimbal calibration you could see the live camera screen behind the menu snap level then finish the process. I'll fly it some more over the next few days and see if it sticks.....
I should add that I did all this stuff before the update with no luck.
Dave
But if the former then that would indicate the tilt data is oddly not derived from the accelerometers in the IMU. Is that the gist of what you're thinking?I had looked at this post a while back. Can't tell much from the video, but the narrative says that the poster's tilt problem is evident in the east/west direction and is intermittent. Not much to be gained from this observation to determine if the tilt is related to errors in the geomagnetic inclination value.
What would be significant is several observations exhibiting tilt while facing east/west. That or, a single observation where tilt occurs in a non east/west direction. The latter would pretty much mean that tilt is not related to errors in the geomagnetic inclination value.
I'd prefer to wait until, and if, it's determined that tilt problems are correlated with east/west direction before trying to determine a causal relationship. The gimbal has to be using IMU data to correct for the pitch and roll actions of the P3. Most of the pitch and roll actions are not in the geomagnetic inclination plane.But if the former then that would indicate the tilt data is oddly not derived from the accelerometers in the IMU. Is that the gist of what you're thinking?
There are four connection points because there are 4 rubber dampers to absorb the vibration. But due to the design criteria of those dampers that do not provide enough holding force for the camera and gimbal in the case of a crash or hard landing, so the engineers decided to place two safety pins to take that force if it occurred to help prevent the camera from completely disconnecting in the hard landing or crash event.Ok I just removed the other 2, but again why are there 4 connection points? Does that actually affect anything if you used all 4?
Dave
If you use all four, you probably will induce vibration to your camera and cause a jello effect in your recordings.There are four connection points because there are 4 rubber dampers to absorb the vibration. But due to the design criteria of those dampers that do not provide enough holding force for the camera and gimbal in the case of a crash or hard landing, so the engineers decided to place two safety pins to take that force if it occurred to help prevent the camera from completely disconnecting in the hard landing or crash event.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.