some people just not that smart
** most people are not that smart **
I'll quote Einstein in reference (he was kind of smart).
"Two things are infinite, the universe; and human stupidity. But, I am not sure about the universe."
some people just not that smart
"Section 336(a)(2) requires model aircraft to be operated within a community- based set of safety guidelines and within the programming of a nationwide community- based organization. Congress explained that it intended “nationwide community-based organization” to mean, in part, a “membership based association that represents the aeromodeling community within the Unites States; [and] provides its members a comprehensive set of safety guidelines that underscores safe aeromodeling operations within the National Airspace System and the protection and safety of the general public on the ground . . . .” U.S. House, FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Conference Report (to Accompany H.R. 658), 112 H. Rpt. 381 (Feb. 1, 2012) (discussion of special rule for model aircraft). Based on this language, which provides context to Congress’ use of the term “nationwide community-based organization,” the FAA expects that model aircraft operations conducted under section 336(a) will be operated according to those guidelines."
So if you can convince the FAA that registering for a DJI Phantom-specific forum that hasn't developed and published such a set of guidelines qualifies, then sure!
Joking aside, such an organization could be founded, but it would be a pretty serious undertaking. I read somewhere that the FAA stated that the AMA was the only organization that they were aware of that currently met the definition. Maybe there is another out there?
"Could not the "Phantom Pilots Forum" a nationwide community organization, publish this set of safety guideline ? Then we as members of said organization are following the regulation?
Sent from my iPad using PhantomPilots mobile app
Indeed! Although the AMA would have you believe that they are the one and only nationwide community based organization, if that was the case, the FAA would have stated you have to follow the AMA Guidelines. We here have our own community-based set of safety Guidelines! We hereby reject the AMA Guidelines and adopt as our only safety Guideline "No reckless flying!" That has been the FAA's ONLY overriding guideline for everyone all along, and if it is good enough for the FAA, it's good enough for us!It covers everything!
The reality is that anything that is or could be dangerous such as flying a 3lb object 400' over the heads of unsuspecting people will most definitely at some point be regulated. And in my opinion it should be. Doesn't matter if a few drone operators are "stupid" and don't follow the rules or not. In other words. A few bad apples are not going to ruin it for the rest of us the inherent danger of this hobby is what is going to bring about these rules. I don't want to be walking through the city and have anything fall on my head. the reality is these drones are not perfect, look at all the fly always and crashes people post. That's why I fly over sparcly populated areas. I'm a realist and even though I have great confidence in my abilities to pilot I don't have the same in confidence in the equipment.
Rereading 101/107 rules and finding my fit: I think I'll be OK after all.
For example, I don't consider this "over people" as there is no one below me, and my height is about 550 feet, which is fine because it's counted from above the structure I'm near, so looks like I'll be able to continue to work for the 6 clients in this photo.View attachment 63518
Interesting conclusion without any legal support. So if more than half of AMA members could also care less about what rules or regulations are passed by the FAA, does that mean they are also not a qualifying nationwide community organization? Do you just enjoy making this stuff up?You do not have to be a member of AMA or any other organization to fly under section 336 Special Rules for Model Aircraft.
This forum wouldn't qualify as a nationwide community organization as more then half here could care less what rules or regulations are passed by the FAA. But you will sooner or later.
Just fire up the motors and GO! There is no photosensor on the aircraft that prevents flying at night! You are still "able" to fly at night!I like that night shot you had up of the city at night! What a shame. People should be able to fly at night!
I like that night shot you had up of the city at night! What a shame. People should be able to fly at night!
The reality is that anything that is or could be dangerous such as flying a 3lb object 400' over the heads of unsuspecting people will most definitely at some point be regulated. And in my opinion it should be. Doesn't matter if a few drone operators are "stupid" and don't follow the rules or not. In other words. A few bad apples are not going to ruin it for the rest of us the inherent danger of this hobby is what is going to bring about these rules. I don't want to be walking through the city and have anything fall on my head. the reality is these drones are not perfect, look at all the fly always and crashes people post. That's why I fly over sparcly populated areas. I'm a realist and even though I have great confidence in my abilities to pilot I don't have the same in confidence in the equipment.
If this question is off topic or a high jack I apologize upfront.
Forever it has been argued that only the FAA controls the airspace however with the statement that says in part, hobbits should follow a community-based organizations guidelines, where does that leave us for flying over private property, i.e., homes, private land, etc.?
We have observed posting of it being okay if we were X feet above them or we were just passing over, but when I look to one community-based organizations guidelines, AMA in this case, they don't support it. They consider it trespassing. Have I got this all wrong? Does it change if it is a business that is open to the public vs a private local?
Just trying to sort this all out.
What is your interpretation of this?:
B. RADIO CONTROL (RC)
1. All pilots shall avoid flying directly over unprotected people, vessels, vehicles or structures and shall avoid endangerment of life and property of others.
I certainly could be wrong, so please take a lot at this page I found on their site and give me your opinion if I am miss understanding what was said within.
Link is:
http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/2012RevisedModelFliersandNeighborsDOC.pdf
Yeah, I guess that would cover that. I attached the "unprotected" to all of the items - people, vessels, vehicles, and structures, but yeah, that makes more sense. They likely need to revise it a bit to be less focused on fixed wing (which usually fly at a field or park dedicated to it, and which don't have the safeguards that a Phantom - for example - has) and more inclusive of quads. If I drop the controls for or lose signal to an RC fixed wing, down it goes - and if you are about to overfly something, there's a decent risk that it will hit that thing. Not so with a Phantom. The date on this is 2014; before the dramatic increase in drone/quad usage.
** most people are not that smart **
I'll quote Einstein in reference (he was kind of smart).
"Two things are infinite, the universe; and human stupidity. But, I am not sure about the universe."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.