saltire said:Very impressive and also the fact that you are using stock Dji transmitter and no fancy Futaba ect.I would be thinking about a tracker now .
I'd be interested to know why too.The really weird thing is that the IRC5800 duo didnt switch to the helical at all, at any point in the flight. Dont know why :?:
havasuphoto said:I'd be interested to know why too.The really weird thing is that the IRC5800 duo didnt switch to the helical at all, at any point in the flight. Dont know why :?:
So, you went up over 500 meters in height!!!
I wonder if someone is good at Trigonometry and could tell us the relevant distance we are going, through triangulation?
OI Photography said:2trickpony said:3456m @ 587m = ?
3505.4m
ladykate said:You were at 16% battery on landing. Do you think there would be enough lifties in the airplane to go 50 percent farther?
The breakup when you wheeled around was awesome. I know that feeling - it isn't good. Backing up at that distance might be a solution (I see others have done it that way).
If the helical wasn't working then this is a great statement about the other antennas.
I would go back out, when you had the time, and just use the Helical antenna, and see what happens.2trickpony said:ladykate said:You were at 16% battery on landing. Do you think there would be enough lifties in the airplane to go 50 percent farther?
The breakup when you wheeled around was awesome. I know that feeling - it isn't good. Backing up at that distance might be a solution (I see others have done it that way).
If the helical wasn't working then this is a great statement about the other antennas.
I reckon if I didnt have to climb to over 500m the battery would have let me go further. Climbing kills the battery.
Also you have to figure in the wind, which must have been at least 25mph at the highest point
When the breakup became bad I could still just see the telemetry so I used the diamond to locate home direction. I knew I had plenty of height so just pushed the controller forward and headed towards home.
This is the problem where I live, no flat space anywhere !!
I'm still a bit concerned about the helical though. I had high hopes for that and I was sure if it should have kicked in.
havasuphoto said:I would go back out, when you had the time, and just use the Helical antenna, and see what happens.2trickpony said:ladykate said:You were at 16% battery on landing. Do you think there would be enough lifties in the airplane to go 50 percent farther?
The breakup when you wheeled around was awesome. I know that feeling - it isn't good. Backing up at that distance might be a solution (I see others have done it that way).
If the helical wasn't working then this is a great statement about the other antennas.
I reckon if I didnt have to climb to over 500m the battery would have let me go further. Climbing kills the battery.
Also you have to figure in the wind, which must have been at least 25mph at the highest point
When the breakup became bad I could still just see the telemetry so I used the diamond to locate home direction. I knew I had plenty of height so just pushed the controller forward and headed towards home.
This is the problem where I live, no flat space anywhere !!
I'm still a bit concerned about the helical though. I had high hopes for that and I was sure if it should have kicked in.
Also; it would be nice to find a correlation, through triangulation, as to what is the Minimum Altitude, for a given distance.
Start at say 25 meters=? how far. 35 meters?, etc.....do you see where I"m going with this?
And, that is with "usable" video-meaning you still have a picture sufficient to fly with.
I back up from my maximum distances, until I reach a "known" distance where I know I won't lose RC or Video, then turn 180 degree's. I'm able to go straight back, using the little left right arrows, that show me I'm exactly 180 degree's from home. I still don't use IOC, much. Guess if I was smarter I could just flip Home Lock, and pull back....doh!!!
2trickpony said:ghinson said:Installed the IRC 600mW, Black Pearl monitor last night (with iosd mini) with the stock antennas. Today, first flight, really only got 175m or so of usable video feed.
I knew it would be less than some of the setups in this feed with improved antennae, but that seemed a little short. Does that sound right, or do you think I'm getting some interference somewhere?
The Tx is coming out the back left of the Phantom, and the monitor is mounted onto the controller.
Well, this is the reason this thread exists, to try and figure out why certain tx, rx and antenna combinations work while others dont.
Once I try out my RC5800duo RX with the rc600mW TX I should hopefully be able to say for certain where the problem is.
You should be able to get more than 175m, thats just not good enough.
If you could post some pics of the way you have things setup it may help us to solve your issue.
lotusman said:Nice setup, are you using black pearl? How are you powering the duo rx, from the DC out on the BP?
2trickpony said:ghinson said:Installed the IRC 600mW, Black Pearl monitor last night (with iosd mini) with the stock antennas. Today, first flight, really only got 175m or so of usable video feed.
I knew it would be less than some of the setups in this feed with improved antennae, but that seemed a little short. Does that sound right, or do you think I'm getting some interference somewhere?
The Tx is coming out the back left of the Phantom, and the monitor is mounted onto the controller.
Well, this is the reason this thread exists, to try and figure out why certain tx, rx and antenna combinations work while others dont.
Once I try out my RC5800duo RX with the rc600mW TX I should hopefully be able to say for certain where the problem is.
You should be able to get more than 175m, thats just not good enough.
If you could post some pics of the way you have things setup it may help us to solve your issue.
Jaybee said:I'm ordering my FPV stuff this week but still undecided if I should get the IRC600 or Fatshark 250 to work with the Black Pearl.
I am getting the feeling that IRC600 / Black Pearl is giving much better results when using the Black Hawk antennas, so I'm thinking I should order:
- - Black Pearl
- IRC600
- Blackhawk Micro 5.8 GHz 9 dBi set with Nimrod LHCP
- Single Nimrod FPV 5.8GHz LHCP
Any advice appreciated.
Seems like a good system judging by your tests so far. Cheers for those btw.Shrimpfarmer said:Thats the setup I will end up with I think. I am still waiting for my Nimrod to arrive but if it turns out to be good then I will buy another one for my Black Pearl.
I can see this being on the cards too at some pointShrimpfarmer said:Next on the agenda for me is some goggles I think.
Shrimpfarmer said:Thats the setup I will end up with I think. I am still waiting for my Nimrod to arrive but if it turns out to be good then I will buy another one for my Black Pearl.
Next on the agenda for me is some goggles I think.
ladykate said:Shrimpy, you started out saying you didn't want goggles but are now leaning towards them. I think I'm in the same boat. Your concerns about them were mine, too. If I decide to go BVR, the goggles might make sense. Let us know what you settle on. I'm considering the Predator Fatshark versions - I've seen them on sale a couple of times and they can accept corrective lenses - and my current antennas fit them...etc...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.