- Joined
- Dec 29, 2016
- Messages
- 297
- Reaction score
- 30
Well considering the Yuneec Q500 is just as much as a phantom 4 and has no sensors and terrible range, I wouldn't waste my money on Yuneec.
Well considering the Yuneec Q500 is just as much as a phantom 4 and has no sensors and terrible range, I wouldn't waste my money on Yuneec.
I was thinking the same thing. There is so much competition now and Hubsan and Yuneec among others are real contenders. DJI is like Microsoft and some of these other companies. They have a product that is admittedly buggy and they squander the resources which should be used fixing existing problems, instead on a new "improved much better wonderful" (BUGGY TOO) new product.
OK then, buy something else, and if enough people do it then that will constitute competition for DJI. Post back here what you bought in place of a DJI product.Have you ever flown anything else? They aren't inferior if their advertised features work and DJI's don't. They aren't inferior if good customer service rectifies your issues quickly and DJI's doesn't. On paper DJI has no competition, but reality is much different.
****! I wonder how it works?QR X900 for $4,400 and includes a parachute. Four or six blade convertible too. Possibility of one hour flight time according to this site: Walkera's methanol-fuelled range extender keeps a QR X900 hexacopter in the air for more than an hour
http://newatlas.com/walkera-qr-900-hybrid-hexacopter-drone-range-extender/41190/
The M200 looks like what the M600 should have been. No doubt an Inspire 2 Pro or Inspire 2 v2 is on the way by summer.![]()
Doesn't make the drone itself better. The camera is also worse then the same price phantom 4Commercial users aren't flying out 4 miles, it's not even legal. Yuneec has something going for it that DJI doesn't and it's worth far more to business customers than OA or illegal range: solid customer service.
Have you ever flown anything else? They aren't inferior if their advertised features work and DJI's don't. They aren't inferior if good customer service rectifies your issues quickly and DJI's doesn't. On paper DJI has no competition, but reality is much different.
Of course. Drones are probably among the most complicated and sophisticated consumer technologies available and there will always be issues with new models. Always. Deal with it.I'm a member of the Yuneec sister site and can tell you they have a lot of issues with those units as well. True customer service is good, but that shouldn't be the selling point. I've had my P3A and it has had no manufacturer issues so I have no need for CS. Many on Yuneec's forum end up sending their units back multiple times because of issues that arise.
Doesn't make the drone itself better. The camera is also worse then the same price phantom 4
Then why be on DJI forum?It makes it better when you're a commercial user whose primary concerns are safety and reliability - not marketable features that may or may not work correctly. Just like Samsung, DJI knows how to throw the cutting edge feature ideas out there, but (just like Samsung) it isn't so good at making them functional realities. Then, just like Samsung (and, really, most cell phone manufacturers), it moves to the next product rather than fixing the functionality of the first. That won't win the business of enterprise customers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.