- Joined
- Feb 9, 2017
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1
- Age
- 39
Hello all!
I'm a civil engineer and we've been using a Phantom 4 to produce aerials and topography information to develop conceptual designs and determine the feasibility of some engineering projects. GCPs are being used, which are measured by our survey crew. We've been laying out flight plans and performing the flights using the Drone Deploy app, and then we process everything in Pix4D.
For a number of reasons, we've now upgraded to the Phantom 4 Pro. With the Phantom 4 Pro's 20 MP camera (versus the P4's 12 MP camera), I suspect that we can fly higher (and therefore spend less time flying) and produce aerial imagery of the same quality as what we were getting from the P4. Is my logic flawed or does that make sense? Looking for any thoughts / ideas / pitfalls.
Thanks!
I'm a civil engineer and we've been using a Phantom 4 to produce aerials and topography information to develop conceptual designs and determine the feasibility of some engineering projects. GCPs are being used, which are measured by our survey crew. We've been laying out flight plans and performing the flights using the Drone Deploy app, and then we process everything in Pix4D.
For a number of reasons, we've now upgraded to the Phantom 4 Pro. With the Phantom 4 Pro's 20 MP camera (versus the P4's 12 MP camera), I suspect that we can fly higher (and therefore spend less time flying) and produce aerial imagery of the same quality as what we were getting from the P4. Is my logic flawed or does that make sense? Looking for any thoughts / ideas / pitfalls.
Thanks!