FAA Won’t Charge Rogue Drone Pilot Who Stopped Firefighters
- Thread starter dirkclod
- Start date
Not enough evidence but being in the area with a drone is no good
I remember when that happened and didn't know what they did till i saw that today.
Maybe though they got some folks attention.
Maybe though they got some folks attention.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2019
- Messages
- 52
- Reaction score
- 30
- Age
- 70
The headline is obviously meant to get clicks. It should say:
“FAA Can’t Find Rogue Drone Pilot Who Stopped Firefighting“
or
“FAA Investigated A Drone Pilot And Found Insufficient Evidence to Prosecute”
or
“We Have Nothing To Report But Need More Clicks”
I’m complaining about the “journalism,” not the FAA, or the subject pilot who we know nothing about other he/she is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
“FAA Can’t Find Rogue Drone Pilot Who Stopped Firefighting“
or
“FAA Investigated A Drone Pilot And Found Insufficient Evidence to Prosecute”
or
“We Have Nothing To Report But Need More Clicks”
I’m complaining about the “journalism,” not the FAA, or the subject pilot who we know nothing about other he/she is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Last edited:
My peave also. It's sloppy reporting. Garrick airport was one of those sloppy reporting stories. It got everyone riled up. They had everyone seeing Drone. Great for thier ratings. It did a lot of negative/ hate to drones.
Similar threads
