- Joined
- Feb 17, 2016
- Messages
- 644
- Reaction score
- 255
- Age
- 29

Port Kembla man faces $28k fine over low-flying drone
A warning for other recreational drone flyers.
Ouch. Sorry for the guy, but he had it coming if he did do low fly bys repeatedly.![]()
Port Kembla man faces $28k fine over low-flying drone
A warning for other recreational drone flyers.www.illawarramercury.com.au
Exactly! I do have the good fortune to live where nearly everyone knows me. Those who don't are new to the area or "transplants" as we call them. I am able to get permission from nearly anyone I ask to fly over their property when necessary. I try to avoid it when I can, and living in a rural area makes it fairly easy. We have about 7500 acres between what we own and what we rent, scattered across 3 counties in central Missouri. Only place I can't fly is a piece of property we rent within 5 miles of the airfield on Fort Leonard Wood. Drone won't even spin a prop inside that red circle...He was asking for it, not much sympathy.
It isn't always practical to obtain approval from every residence you might fly over but when overflying I always ensure that I maintain an altitude and speed so as to transit the property as quickly and unobtrusively as possible, and of course never loiter over private property for any reason.
![]()
Port Kembla man faces $28k fine over low-flying drone
A warning for other recreational drone flyers.www.illawarramercury.com.au
I wonder what the burden of proof is for these offences? Did this offender have his day in court or does Civil Aviation Safety Authority just levy a fine. Does a prosecutor have to present evidence or does the CASA act as judge, jury and executioner? Is the drone pilot innocent until proven guilty or assumed to be guilty because the neighbor doesn’t like drones? And finally, does the Civil Aviation Safety Authority realize that their acronym means house in Spanish?![]()
Port Kembla man faces $28k fine over low-flying drone
A warning for other recreational drone flyers.www.illawarramercury.com.au
I THINK THEY ARE MAKING AN EXAMPLE OF HIM!
That simple.
People keep driving within 30m if my home in their cars, out on the street in front! Their cars are noisy and they are looking in my windows! I want this horrible intrusion to stop! They should all be fined $28,000.
Ridiculous! It’s an aircraft, it flies over things. If he was not trying to harass and bother the neighbors on purpose then tough luck for them. We all live with some things we don’t like. Personally I think that people who mow the lawn or blow leaves in the morning should be put to death, but I just live with them, that’s life! People need to learn tolerance.
I'd have to agree with you on that. Most of the time these incidents stem from something deeper. A wrong, whether it was intentional or not, real or not, has triggered the behavior. There's bad blood between the accused and the accuser. Someone who intentionally harassed another with a drone is not completely stable. I'm not the most sane person on the planet, but I can't see me doing something like that. Not saying it couldn't happen. I'm just saying my Grandma would come up outta her grave and snatch me bald-headed if I did it. Raising has a lot to do with your actions.While I have sided with the operator of the drone in these stories, my opinion is different based only what I’ve read in the account. This person need mental health assistance before something more serious occurs and the incident most likely will not involve a drone.
The fine is excessive and accomplishes nothing. The fine is just a CYA for the authority to say “we’ve done all we could”. They have done nothing and they are ill prepared to deal with the root issue(s) of the offender.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.