- Joined
- Mar 26, 2017
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 21
- Age
- 79
Do you have any specific data to back up that assertion? I don't think the actual voting record would match that. The majority of votes on Security Council Resolutions (2017 votes here) are unanimous in favor.I don't know why we even are still a member. Almost every other nation always votes against the US.
U.S. businesses generated more than $1.5 billion in contracts with the United Nations between 2014 and 2016. The businesses provide a range of goods and services, including telecommunications, financial services, construction, food production, and production of armored vehicles.
Even when a Security Council resolution is not legally required for an action, the UN's imprimatur can still prove extremely useful for the United States. A council decision does not just spread expense and political risk, by diluting Washington's responsibility for a course of action that might provoke resentment or hostility. It is also easier for many governments to sell a policy to their publics if they can describe it as a response to a UN resolution, instead of to an American request. The United States has already learned this lesson: for example, when it has tried to prompt countries to revise and update their domestic security procedures or laws on terrorism, it has discovered that governments are often happier to receive the same American expert as a UN adviser than as a U.S. one.
Yes it was and that's where you guys can post on this .Posted yesterday...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.