- Joined
- Jun 29, 2020
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 18
- Age
- 65
Pictures; or it didn’t happen.Yes or no reports of me dating a supermodel are also highly exaggerated
I guess you never flown around helicoptersIt would be much better for drone flyers if there would be some altitude limits (20 m or so) and if you stay within no autorizations or other administrative actions would be necessary. I think that so close to the ground no manned aircraft can fly unless you are directly on a runway.
Maybe he meant feet.I guess you never flown around helicopters
When I see people keep trying to make an excuse to get around the rules, it only leads to them breaking those rules. Do it, then ask for permission later mentality.Maybe he meant feet.![]()
The rules are the rules CAA or FAA, I tell people the same until you are in the position to make changes to the rules/ways things are done you need to follow the rules under those that are in charge, like them or not.I think you are overreacting. I have no intention to fly out of regulations and never did. I'm just practical. Nobody would call authorities for flying to about 20 m on it's own yard. Even some trees are higher than that. The pilot of manned craft who fly around tree tops must be completely irresponsible. Helicopters always fly higher than 120 m (at least by us, maybe in USA is different) unless they are on a mission just around where you are. But you'll clearly see and hear them and nobody would be so stupid to fly around the helicopter.
Ok. I can’t resist jumping back in here. I guess sort of in Andy’s defense. I took his comments as a wish list item for how rules may be changed to be more accommodating to low level flight in otherwise restricted airspace. It’s probably fair game to agree or disagree with his proposal. But I didn’t take it as him wanting to circumvent the rules. Just change them.It was just discussion or maybe this is not allowed about the rules? My personal opinion has nothing to do with the rules!
Thanks!Ok. I can’t resist jumping back in here. I guess sort of in Andy’s defense. I took his comments as a wish list item for how rules may be changed to be more accommodating to low level flight in otherwise restricted airspace. It’s probably fair game to agree or disagree with his proposal. But I didn’t take it as him wanting to circumvent the rules. Just change them.
Yeah we can argue that posting our wishes here won’t get anything changed. But what fun is that.![]()
I fly my P4P, it's under 50ft. alt. looking for deer tracks and good fishing spots and calling a busy air traffic controller for permission to do that struck me as some bureaucrat's busywork...so the comment was intended in jest and some missed it. Sorry for any confusion...Maybe I missed a post or something? I didn’t see Cliff2020 talk about flying up and down runways or getting planes put into a holding pattern. Or any such seemingly exaggerated assertions. Again if I missed a post I apologize. But as I’m sure you know it used to be SOP to call a tower to notify (not actually permission) to fly within certain limits of the airfield or airport. Not just for “up and down a runway” nor to have manned air traffic put in a holding pattern. This was the case before LAANC - which I’m pretty sure you’d be aware of. So, again, I’m not sure if I missed a comment indicating that Cliff is flying up and down runways.
No problem, conversation like these make me think and keep me on my toes (Iron sharpens Iron), and I'm sure there are others that struggle with what is happening in this industry.It's all good man we're all human beings here and I think we all share the love of Aviation. So appreciate all the comments the good the bad and yes the ugly
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.