- Joined
- Jun 29, 2016
- Messages
- 418
- Reaction score
- 149
- Age
- 63
This question came up somewhere else and I didn't know the answer so I'm interested to know if anybody here knows. I'm going to attempt to keep it as short as I can so forgive me if it's hard to understand. It was actually much longer as a conversation, but this is the gist of it. If it's not clear, please ask.
Let's suppose I have programmed an autonomous flight and that the flight is programmed correctly. No human errors in other words. I fly the flight and something goes wrong with the craft and it crashes beyond owner repair. Let's suppose further that the logs clearly show a fault with the system itself. Let's call it a GPS failure just for example, but it could have been an ESC or anything like that. So here's the question.
Many times, DJI has stood behind these types of crashes with GO! and replaced the craft. Will the flight log show that Litchi was in use and will DJI use that as a crutch and an "out" to reject any claim against craft failure or would they take responsibility if the failure was indeed something that was a defect failure?
Hope that makes sense. I look forward to seeing supported answers.
Let's suppose I have programmed an autonomous flight and that the flight is programmed correctly. No human errors in other words. I fly the flight and something goes wrong with the craft and it crashes beyond owner repair. Let's suppose further that the logs clearly show a fault with the system itself. Let's call it a GPS failure just for example, but it could have been an ESC or anything like that. So here's the question.
Many times, DJI has stood behind these types of crashes with GO! and replaced the craft. Will the flight log show that Litchi was in use and will DJI use that as a crutch and an "out" to reject any claim against craft failure or would they take responsibility if the failure was indeed something that was a defect failure?
Hope that makes sense. I look forward to seeing supported answers.