No, the props need to be removed but I have mine setup so the props are very easy to access in the area they are stored. The wrench is so easy to get to as well. This bag is the bomb. It's got so much space and is very well made. You will really like it.I have a very similar system, from Drone World, although I would prefer your foam system.
Question : Does the position of your phantom allow the props to be left on the drone? There system does not !
Thanks
![]()
No, the props need to be removed but I have mine setup so the props are very easy to access in the area they are stored. The wrench is so easy to get to as well. This bag is the bomb. It's got so much space and is very well made. You will really like it.
I disagree. Physically it's very feasible to design a backpack that allows the props to remain installed. Imho the added dimensions wouldn't be a big deal in comparison to this drone crates backpack. That's what I'm waiting for, as I'm spoiled with my hard case that allows storage with props. I currently have a cheap backpack that would allow propped storage if it was 22"high instead of 18". Someday someone will make one, and I'll buy it.This is correct. The bag is too narrow to keep the props on. I doubt anyone will make a bag where you can keep the props on, or if they do the width or height would be crazy tall/wide which in effect would make it less portable.
With prop on not only save time but you can save screw inside the prop it self. The screw made of plastic, if you always put on put off every time you want to fly, it will damage the screw. Because human error when put it on to tight.Yea we do understand people want to keep the props on to save time. With that said as someone that's also an enthusiast I personally never keep the props on. I spend the time and energy to balance all my props and I'm not willing to risk them getting thrown off to save the 30 secs it takes to put them on.
I'm unclear about your logic. By not having to install the props with every flight location, the risk of losing a prop is less. The more you install and uninstall the more likely you will make a mistake not tightening one prop and losing the bird. I balance my props too, and handling the props on and off so much increases risk of damage in the process, although I admit the risk is low and I do this all the time with my current $50 backpack. I would buy another backpack if someone made one that allowed propped storage. It's very convenient for quick launch and quick packing and leave, as I have with my microraptor hard case.Yea we do understand people want to keep the props on to save time. With that said as someone that's also an enthusiast I personally never keep the props on. I spend the time and energy to balance all my props and I'm not willing to risk them getting thrown off to save the 30 secs it takes to put them on.
Yes, I agree.I disagree. Physically it's very feasible to design a backpack that allows the props to remain installed. Imho the added dimensions wouldn't be a big deal in comparison to this drone crates backpack. That's what I'm waiting for, as I'm spoiled with my hard case that allows storage with props. I currently have a cheap backpack that would allow propped storage if it was 22"high instead of 18". Someday someone will make one, and I'll buy it.
I'm unclear about your logic. By not having to install the props with every flight location, the risk of losing a prop is less. The more you install and uninstall the likely you will make a mistake not tightening one prop and losing the bird. I balance my props too, and handling the props on and off so much increases risk of damage in the process, although I admit the risk is low and I do this all the time with my current $50 backpack. I would buy another backpack if someone made one that allowed propped storage. It's very convenient for quick launch and quick packing and leave, as I have with my microraptor hard case.
Yes, I agree.
This bag is 22" high.
With props on, the P3 is 20".
So, I don't understand why a 22" bag would not fit a P3 with props on, assuming the rounded top of the bag instead were squared.
One problem though would be the risk that the prop blades could be deformed since the bag lid is soft and not as protecting.
You forgetting to factor in any kind of padding and thickness of material. A bag that would factor all that in would closer to 24" at a minimum, also the Phantom would be have to be mounted dead center in the bag and would limit the ability to put in other accessories. This would also be like strapping our roller case your back which eliminates the main point of a backpack being portable. On top of that your then getting in to an area where you might run into carry on problems with airlines.
Also we do not sell enough volume to do a custom bag. Custom soft goods are very expensive to design and produce and have much much longer lead times from time of inception to final product. With the way the current UAV/DRONE/Multirotor industry is and how quickly the products change we as a company need to be able to adapt our products quickly and do this would not make business sense unless for example DJI was to come out and say they are not going to change their Phantom's shape for the next several years.
Thanks for the good reply.You forgetting to factor in any kind of padding and thickness of material. A bag that would factor all that in would closer to 24" at a minimum, also the Phantom would be have to be mounted dead center in the bag and would limit the ability to put in other accessories. This would also be like strapping our roller case your back which eliminates the main point of a backpack being portable. On top of that your then getting in to an area where you might run into carry on problems with airlines.
Also we do not sell enough volume to do a custom bag. Custom soft goods are very expensive to design and produce and have much much longer lead times from time of inception to final product. With the way the current UAV/DRONE/Multirotor industry is and how quickly the products change we as a company need to be able to adapt our products quickly and do this would not make business sense unless for example DJI was to come out and say they are not going to change their Phantom's shape for the next several years.
If the screw made of alu like l self tightening prop on phantom 2 it would be ok, but for phantom 3 self tightening prop is made of plastic. And there is a change to over tightening due humen error.DJI made the props self tightening so there is no real worry about not have them on properly or worrying about over tightening, so I'm not sure how that will be an issue.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.