How would one wearing goggles maintain vlos?It still states we can fly with fpv as long as we maintain los. At least thats how I interpreted it.
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
How would one wearing goggles maintain vlos?It still states we can fly with fpv as long as we maintain los. At least thats how I interpreted it.
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
I dunno about that but I was referring to a setup of a screen mounted to the rc.How would one wearing goggles maintain vlos?
It still states we can fly with fpv as long as we maintain los. At least thats how I interpreted it.
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
I brought this up earlier in the day but don't remember getting an answer. It's going be difficult to get pilots to comply with flying within vlos when they have a tablet in front of them and a quad that can go out over a mile away. Some say they can see them at a long distance but just seeing a dot in the sky and not seeing it well enough to control it is not really vlos.I dunno about that but I was referring to a setup of a screen mounted to the rc.
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
we really wont know until Monday how it is all going to shake out
That's not exactly how the FAA interprets it.
By definition, a model aircraft must be “flown within visual line of sight of the person operating the aircraft.” P.L. 112-95, section 336(c)(2).1 Based on the plain language of the statute, the FAA interprets this requirement to mean that: (1) the aircraft must be visible at all times to the operator; (2) that the operator must use his or her own natural vision (which includes vision corrected by standard eyeglasses or contact lenses) to observe the aircraft; and (3) people other than the operator may not be used in lieu of the operator for maintaining visual line of sight. Under the criteria above, visual line of sight would mean that the operator has an unobstructed view of the model aircraft. To ensure that the operator has the best view of the aircraft, the statutory requirement would preclude the use of vision-enhancing devices, such as binoculars, night vision goggles, powered vision magnifying devices, and goggles designed to provide a “first-person view” from the model.2 Such devices would limit the operator’s field of view thereby reducing his or her ability to see-and-avoid other aircraft in the area. Additionally, some of these devices could dramatically increase the distance at which an operator could see the aircraft, rendering the statutory visual-line-of-sight requirements meaningless. Finally, based on the plain language of the statute, which says that aircraft must be “flown within the visual line of sight of the person operating the aircraft,” an operator could not rely on another person to satisfy the visual line of sight requirement. See id. (emphasis added). While the statute would not preclude using an observer to augment the safety of the operation, the operator must be able to view the aircraft at all times.What this seems to prohibit is the use of goggles that obstruct the observer's vision. It does NOT seem to prohibit looking at the FPV on a tablet/phone as long as you can still see the aircraft.
1 For purposes of the visual line of sight requirement, “operator” means the person manipulating the model aircraft’s controls.
2 The FAA is aware that at least one community-based organization permits “first person view” (FPV) operations during which the hobbyist controls the aircraft while wearing goggles that display images transmitted from a camera mounted in the front of the model aircraft. While the intent of FPV is to provide a simulation of what a pilot would see from the flight deck of a manned aircraft, the goggles may obstruct an operator’s vision, thereby preventing the operator from keeping the model aircraft within his or her visual line of sight at all times.
(https://www.faa.gov/uas/media/model_aircraft_spec_rule.pdf)
What seems clear - and, indeed, I don't know how so many on this forum don't seem to get it (or maybe care about it) is that YOU MUST BE ABLE TO SEE YOUR AIRCRAFT AT ALL TIMES WITH THE NAKED EYE. ("the aircraft must be visible at all times to the operator", "the operator must use his or her own natural vision (which includes vision corrected by standard eyeglasses or contact lenses) to observe the aircraft"). This precludes these multi-mile missions that some people are apparently flying all the time where they cannot see their Phantom - or any potential hazards that it might encounter, stationary or not.
Yeah with the FPV reference, I automatically assume tablet/phone as well. If this is the case, this should be a relief for some including me. Unless for some reason this gets revamped in the next couple of days to specifically include tablets and phones.
Someone please show me something directly on the FAA site that says a hobby flyer will be required to get a 107 cert to fly with or without FPV. Until I see it on the FAA page it is just a rumor as far as I am concerned.
I wonder who gets to judge VLOS. Everyone's eyes are not the same, do we go with the LCD or will the FAA eventually make you take a test to see how far your VLOS is and then dial that into your aircraft?
I flew out over the water this week. At about 100 feet up I lost sight of Swarm when I blinked and she was about 600 feet out. Even at that range I wouldn't have been able to tell you orientation without help.
Just like auto and even airplane racing they will waiver some of the regulations for Closed Course Competition.And this may just completely outlaw the little racing drones and planes that are flown almost exclusively FPV with a spotter. It's a real shame if this is really what is going to happen.
Sent from my iPhone using PhantomPilots
At 300' alt, I've lost sight of my bird at less than 300' distance. Maybe it's just me.
I wonder who gets to judge VLOS. Everyone's eyes are not the same, do we go with the LCD or will the FAA eventually make you take a test to see how far your VLOS is and then dial that into your aircraft?
I flew out over the water this week. At about 100 feet up I lost sight of Swarm when I blinked and she was about 600 feet out. Even at that range I wouldn't have been able to tell you orientation without help.
Feh
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.