Skip ahead to 8:40 if you want to go directly to image comparisons:
Sent from my iPhone using PhantomPilots

Skip ahead to 8:40 if you want to go directly to image comparisons:
Sent from my iPhone using PhantomPilots
Check out this video at 8:45 is this what your talking about?
![]()
Is this based on actual experience, or just hollow opinion? At least one actual hands-on video has claimed the exact opposite.
I guess nothing much except that one can use the bigger tablet in controlling it during flight.
I don't see the issue.Doesn't look like a sun shade will be easily installed either which is just silly to me. You'd think a company would be paying attention to forums like this and know that most people use them and maybe make something standard to help with the sun.
After watching Casey's film above, you sure can see the difference in the camera quality between the P4 and the Mav. The P4 is crisp where the Mav is blurred a lot when compared. It will do just fine for the average Joe but the P4 is still a lot cleaner and has great ND filters. They both have their places as the Mav is more portable but I love the camera quality that I have now with my Phantom set ups.
Absolutely nothing -- as far as I can tell. Personally, I'm just a bit miffed that I dropped the cash on the P4. Had I known this would be released in October, I definitely would have waited.
No tip overs with the wide stance therefore, you can take off and land from surfaces that are anything but level.I bought a P4 2 months ago.
Things I like better about the P4:
Higher off the ground when landing - especially in sand or dirt.
Faster
Ability to use a tablet
That said, I will likely pick one up a few months after it is released.
Doesn't the quad have to be level upon startup for gyros etc?No tip overs with the wide stance therefore, you can take off and land from surfaces that are anything but level.
I do wedding and event photography (Canon 5d MkIII, various zoom and prime lenses, lighting, etc) and bought the P4 to add to my service options for clients. As such, only the highest picture quality will work. Granted, there are higher-end drones out there with better cameras, but some are simply too big and too loud and/or cost-prohibitive for a freelancer like me.
Given the choice between all best scenarios, the P4 is the winner and I doubt it will be purchased by many pro photographers and videographers. They'll be using the Inspire or Phantom.
The Mavik is more for the Vlog folks who want to make sure everyone knows what they're doing every minute of their waking life.
Hiya not hollow opinion but just from the above video clip it just sounds way too hollow and light. What im trying to say is its not the same as the p4. Different class drone. Typical marketing have every one think it will take over from the phantom, take huge orders and then next year the new phantom is the bees knees and it will start all over againIs this based on actual experience, or just hollow opinion? At least one actual hands-on video has claimed the exact opposite.
So, hollow opinion then. We have a recording of someone with the unit in their hand that is saying the exact opposite. You're welcome to disagree with him - he could certainly be completely full of crap - but until you have tactile experience, you probably shouldn't be throwing around blind assertions as fact.just from the above video clip
I don't believe so, that's why we have IMU calibration.Doesn't the quad have to be level upon startup for gyros etc?
Hiya,So, hollow opinion then. We have a recording of someone with the unit in their hand that is saying the exact opposite. You're welcome to disagree with him - he could certainly be completely full of crap - but until you have tactile experience, you probably shouldn't be throwing around blind assertions as fact.
Visit this thread over at DJI ForumI appreciate your point of view (and I share your disdain for "Vlog folks," believe me), but I don't agree with your assessment of the Mavic. Granted, I've obviously not seen or flown one personally yet, but from the research I've done, it's everything the P4 is -- and more. It's the best of both worlds. I would be very surprised if the camera on the Mavic were not superior to the one on the P4. Plus, it's so much smaller, has a far superior form factor, better obstacle avoidance technology, an awesome proprietary controller, better range, better FPV flying, new and improved video transmission technology, and the list goes on and on.
I just see no reason whatsoever for DJI to even sell the Phantoms any more unless they literally cut their prices to 1/3 of what they are selling for now.
It makes me mad, too, because I have a lot invested in my Phantom. 4 batteries, extra charger, charging station, carrying case, gimbal protector, range amplifiers, etc.
I have 3 phantoms and at least 4 other quads. All say to start up on level surface. Same thing applies to my 2 gimbals.I don't believe so, that's why we have IMU calibration.
I've been wrong before however, I don't think DJI is referring to gyros etc, perhaps for safety reasons as it may lurch a bit depending on the angle before straightening itself out.I have 3 phantoms and at least 4 other quads. All say to start up on level surface. Same thing applies to my 2 gimbals.
When gyros start up, they have to know what is level . If on start up and not level, they can fly tilted.I've been wrong before however, I don't think DJI is referring to gyros etc, perhaps for safety reasons as it may lurch a bit depending on the angle before straightening itself out.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.