I'm sorry master of your domain. If you insist in measuring..drones and attacking personally instead of replying objectively and dissing other men work, I'm done talking to you.If you are a professional photographer, I really wonder how it happened! You just proved you're just a wannabe with a big mouth, or a very poor professional. I would love to quiz you live on photo, video, and computers, which really are my domain. Trust me you don't want to play that game with me!. You have no clue what we're talking about here. These drones are made to make pictures and videos, if the GP's end up there in the first place it's because of their weight/performance but being an action cam that wide is not compatible with aerial work. There was a lack there and DJI fixed it. Period. You don't see it because you have simply no clue, your still trying to defisheye the picture and you don't even notice the loss during the process. BTW, it is not a question of crappy computer, if you knew computers you would know that as well. BTW, mine is fine thanks and probably eat yours for breakfast, and has definitely a long life ahead being more than comfortable with any kind of processing. If you were a "Professional", you would know that the main jobs you have to cover with a drone are surveys for architecture, agriculture, real estate, action with vehicles, many if not all of them requiring to produce straight lines on pics and video. You don't "defisheye" video like that, it's not serious and definitely not professional. If you just spent 900 bucks on a fisheye, you probably have a use for it!
But definitely not for aerial work!
To finish, I don't "like" my P3; It's just another tool in my case, just like the S900 and my GH4, and the rest of my arsenal of video production equipment. I forgot, it's very rare to have a professional photographer here not linking to his site in his signature. Where is your work Dude?
Yes the version 3. I thought it was mediocre compared to the p3.
I kind of agree. One big draw to the P3 is a whole drone for the same price as lightbridge last year.
Well the camera quality is similar. But you can get double the fps on a GoPro, and that is one of the main reason I bought this model: great slowmoThe difference , if any, is minimal and depend on what, where, and when as well. They do both a good job and the P3 has the advantage to be straight (almost) and doesn't need destructive fisheye correction. I thought this "yes, but, if" P3 pre-release debate was over but apparently not. Useless but quite funny.
The cable cam thing is a killer. If we could have that on the phantom... + the POI, waypoints and follow me... But it's probably too much to ask for
Well the camera quality is similar. But you can get double the fps on a GoPro, and that is one of the main reason I bought this model: great slowmo
I'm sorry.. but that is a very dumb thing to do.
I dont care if there are "entire companies" dedicated to slowmotion, the fact is that is a niche. Only because you like slowmotion dosnt mean everybody need it. There are 10.000 videos without slowmotion on youtube, so what? The fact is you cant even set your ISO and shutterspeed properly which is a huge downside for filming.
Its the other way around mate: just because you don't like slowmotion, you can't say "that is the most useless thing on a drone you can get".
You keep repeating a false claim and hoping it is true? YES you can fix the iso to 100 and shutterspeed 1/60. You said you have both gopro and P3? Clearly you don't have a gopro hero 4 black OR you don't know how to use it: RTFM!
