If you cannot get farther over water something is wrong, have you tried setting a channel manually? When you manually select the best channel, also select the bitrate and set it to 4mbps instead of 10. Have you watched the DJI antenna best practices video?Im lucky to break 800m @ 50M altitude over Water - not impressed with the P4 so far I have to say.
If you cannot get farther over water something is wrong, have you tried setting a channel manually? When you manually select the best channel, also select the bitrate and set it to 4mbps instead of 10. Have you watched the DJI antenna best practices video?
If that's the case then maybe I should purchase the Parrot Bebop 2.Im lucky to break 800m @ 50M altitude over Water - not impressed with the P4 so far I have to say.
worse, before I was getting well over 500m now I am only getting around 50 or so before I losing connection..has anyone experienced an improvement on the poor rc range with the latest fw ? Or has it gotten worse ?
Mine won't even get off the ground.No improvement at all. As a matter of fact it is worse.
Nobody I have seen mention this, I wonder if, DJI did leave everything the same as P3P and even upped the amperage from transmitter like they say (nominal, like .05amp or something ) the P3P you could see the antenna on the craft in places, the P4 enclosed all of the wires, and uses a more robust heavier plastic, that in itself may not seem like much, to DJI either prolly, but if I run into range trouble, I'd think about trying to run slats or something in the legs so the antennas are out in open
Ok, but doesn't glass also bend the spectrum? I mean, radio signals are just another form for electromagnetic wavelengths, at one end of the spectrum and therefor, like the light emitting waves, wouldn't it have SoME effect? Im asking by the way I'm not stating any facts.Like glass, plastic is transparent to the Phantom's 2.4 Ghz radio signals. Exposing the antenna will have no effect on your range.
Ok, but doesn't glass also bend the spectrum? I mean, radio signals are just another form for electromagnetic wavelengths, at one end of the spectrum and therefor, like the light emitting waves, wouldn't it have SoME effect? Im asking by the way I'm not stating any facts.
it seems the proof is in the pudding here, the power on bird side, and the TX side are lower, a lot lower then previous earlier P3P devices like the GL300A's.
I have a 300B with the crappy plastic inside that's too brittle and breaks apart, too late for me tho, I've traded the brand new P4 for the new dual 3W boosters kit. And ordered that huge new antenna that's 14dB, vs the std 9dB one a lot of us use and love. If I can get a small light package to my sister 1.7 miles away over a lake, past a resort with twin 22 story hotels (tallest things around by 18 stories) I'll be stoked, it would also be a cool video
That makes some sense, so car windshields aren't going to lower distance at all then? That's good to know, I mean, I've heard and seen guys doing it, The couple times I've done it, I usually have drivers window down and point out of it, in tx here to be able to sit in AirCo can be difference in enjoying or not enjoying a flightI fly from inside my truck all the time & can't tell any difference in range at all. I'm not a physicist but I believe for the glass to appreciably affect the signal it would have to be shaped & designed for that specific purpose...like a prism is designed with a specific shape to separate composite light into a spectrum.
That makes some sense, so car windshields aren't going to lower distance at all then? That's good to know, I mean, I've heard and seen guys doing it, The couple times I've done it, I usually have drivers window down and point out of it, in tx here to be able to sit in AirCo can be difference in enjoying or not enjoying a flight
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.