Sorry you feel that way, I don't think it was a money making scam since the govt gave up 1.25 million dollars on free registrations that took place during the first month of registration. Also, I read through the entire Interim Final Rule posted on the registry site, it's about 600 pages but I was patient, and what I discovered was that in the fine print, the FAA was not really that interested in finding folks after the fact or hammering them with enforcement actions, the primary goal of modeler registration is to educate, which was accomplished through the "Acknowledgement of Safety Guidelines", that we agreed to during the registration process. I'm glad they did that, I think there were many non-aviation folks getting into the business that don't have foundational knowledge of the National Airspace System, and drones have to share the skies with manned aircraft so the system can have an acceptable level of safety.The FAA Drone registration is a money making scam and that is IT! Like original post said, they ask for no drone information whatsoever. If this was to "Keep people safe" than they would be getting Make, Model, serial numbers, etc so if some idiot causes a crash MAYBE they could trace down who it was. No, this is nothing more than a scam to get $5 off of every American drone owner. I will not re-register when mine expires, trust me.
1.25 million was given up during the free registration period, so don't think that making money was part of the equation.385 thousand signed up times 5 1,925,000 dollars hum no profit I think not
Was that before the deadline or after? Because if it was before the deadline they refunded the 5 bucks!385 thousand signed up times 5 1,925,000 dollars hum no profit I think not
Yeah, because the refunded the money for all the registrations for the first month, they missed out on 1.25 million stones. If they were out to make money, they would not have done refunds. And, I have serious doubts that they can support the registration infrastructure on 5 bucks per registration, just saying. They have to charge 5 dollars because it's in the public law which is mandated by Congress.Was that before the deadline or after? Because if it was before the deadline they refunded the 5 bucks!
Oh I'm so sure .. .most of the folks here wouldn't mind some sort of fence between us and hoi poli. But 'our' gear is the same as 'theirs' so it would be kinda hard. And we don't have the decades it took for the ARRL (American Radio Relay League, the functional equivalent to the AMA) to figure out how to work with the government agencies. The 24 hour news cycle now pretty much precludes anything like that.This crowd doesn't have the same attitude as the hams, so it wouldn't work. (WA4EGI) But then again, hams have to pass a test.... as opposed to CB radio...
I rest my case.
I ...I am really trying to be responsible and it seems a̶l̶m̶o̶s̶t̶ impossible to do so.
Thank you for sharing that post Robert. Very well said.Hello folks, might as well get my two cents in, I agree with wet dog.
I have been flying RC planes and copters for years, and never had to worry about where to fly as long as it was a big field and you stayed in it.
And also some spots I flew in I had to have RC insurance in case my plane went the wrong direction, or hit a expensive car or crashes into a person. Most RC pilots will tell you that even then we did not fly over people, or buildings period. We saw the danger in this especially with gas engines RC,s And seldom if ever did you hear of a RC plane near and airport.
You had no choice but to keep your bird in eye view.
But now, in comes a new way to fly a bird, computer controlled.
As wet dog said you,now have a bird that you can control and computer control. This new bird now reaches beyond the normal fields you normally fly in. this bird now can fly as far as 1.5 miles and beyond. Now they have created a machine that now interferes with real world flight. So folks in here, not all of course, believe that they can take their machine and go where ever they want with no restrictions.
Ask a real world pilot, is he allowed to take off and fly, without a flight report , a log, insurance, engine logs etc.
The FAA had no choice but to put restrictions on this new way of flying equipment. Because it crossed over to real world flying plain and simple.
Just today a report of a drone 200 feet over 747. How many of you good folks want to be on the bad end of that deal if it took that plane down.
To be honest most of the vids I see in here, I can never do, that is If I'm certified. I cannot afford just one mishap of my drone striking anything other then myself. Me I don't care about, but someone else I do.
Most folks are mad because of these new restrictions. I'm bothered about it also, but when I think about it when I'm flying, and I know what these fantastic machines can do, I treat my P3 like a good real world pilot treats his plane, with respect.
My flying time is drastically reduced and where I fly. But that's the cost of flying.
For those that went from RC piloting to phantom flying, all you did was upgrade from a toy to a real machine.
No comparison, I saw that right away. A whole new way of thinking. All I'm saying is that we now have a new hobby that needs to be respected and obeyed.
Oh, and I'm not saying that I have not flown illegally, but I have slowed to small crawl, I almost never go now unless I'm legal, after the registration.
I love this site.
Robert. P3 pilot.
Sent from my iPad using PhantomPilots mobile app
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.