dirkclod
Premium Pilot
N017RW said:![]()
Who could forget this Pilot?! :lol:
AHHH ! Glad ya reminded me,I left mine back in the Lounge !
N017RW said:![]()
Who could forget this Pilot?! :lol:
johnp44 said:HI,
I guess either definition can apply to those of us who already have a pilots license. One would think that having a private or commercial pilots license would supersede any additional requirements.
Or do we need another classification "Pilot Operators"?
dirkclod said:![]()
He gonne be Mad sho nough when he reads all this an get ya'll all booted as he does have a....certain level of decorum around here.... !!
Ya'll ought be ashamed !
Monte55 said:I don't agree with everyone on things and I also don't agree on the consistent attack on him. Just let it go.
And for the final record...I aquired my pilot certification in about 1986. So I am a pilot. Has nothing to do with flying my Quads, helis, and my fixed wing models. They are for me. I don't care what anyone else thinks of them or how I fly. I only need to impress ME.MadMitch88 said:Monte55 said:I don't agree with everyone on things and I also don't agree on the consistent attack on him. Just let it go.
Most of the time you disappoint me with your ignorance and lack of respectability in here, Monte ---- but for once you make sense!
And no, you are NOT a pilot --- you're an OPERATOR --- just for the final record.
![]()
SilentAV8R said:For the purposes of the commercial operations authorized by the sUAS Rule (Part 107) the FAA used the term "operator" simply as a means to avoid requiring all the other regulations that kick in when we are called "pilots." It is a legal maneuver that works in our favor. Call yourself what ever you want to.
The FAA finally notes that the term “operate” is currently a defined term in 14 CFR 1.1 that is used in manned-aircraft operations. While, for purposes of proposed part 107, the proposed definition of “operator” would supersede any conflicting definitions in § 1.1, the FAA invites comments as to whether defining a new crewmember position as an “operator” would cause confusion with the existing terminology. If so, the FAA invites suggestions as to an alternative title for this crewmember position.
MadMitch88 said:Like I've told other members, don't actively pursue getting on my infamous **** List --- not a fun place to be.
No they can ban you whenever they choose for a week or month or forever . I do know this as a fact as Geert banned me for a week once for getting on him for badmouthing at a noob before Christmas which was fixed by Adam and then he did it again for a month after Adam unbanned me and wiped all of my post . Then that's when Geert messed up all and Adam had to fix it on the 31 of Jan. by rolling it back 36 hrs .Monte55 said:I didn't think a troll could get over 500 posts without being banned. Guess I was wrong,
Clipper707 said:Kind of clunky. How about shortening it to "Plopperators?"
I think you gentlemen may be onto something here.SteveMann said:Operate a toilet... :lol:
Wow! About the same as me. According to my license, I got mine 18 Dec 1985. I was 28 at the time. Seems so long ago.Monte55 said:I aquired my pilot certification in about 1986. So I am a pilot.
:shock:dirkclod said:No they can ban you whenever they choose for a week or month or forever . I do know this as a fact as Geert banned me for a week once for getting on him for badmouthing at a noob before Christmas which was fixed by Adam and then he did it again for a month after Adam unbanned me and wiped all of my post . Then that's when Geert messed up all and Adam had to fix it on the 31 of Jan. by rolling it back 36 hrs .Monte55 said:I didn't think a troll could get over 500 posts without being banned. Guess I was wrong,
So it don't matter how many post ya have you can be sent on vacation and come back and carry on .
Why do I get this powerful gut feeling that's not hard to do?Monte55 said:I only need to impress ME.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.