I'm quite aware of the multiple versions and the increased buffering times as resolution is increased. As proof of the better quality of a 4K upload vs a 1080p upload, I uploaded the same video in both formats back in March. At 5:23 in length, this is a lot longer than my typical videos and will be too slow-moving for many. But, the video is definitely my style. The section from 2:15 to 2:45 will give a very good indication of the difference in viewing quality between 1080p and 2160p (4K).Agreed. However, just like the 100Mbs 4K video on the P4P produces a better 4K video than the 60Mbs of the P4, P3 and Mavic, and a DNG holds more data than a camera jpg, when the YouTube compression happens, it preserves more data if you give it more data to begin with. I am told that YouTube preserves more quality on an uploaded 100Mbs file than a lower value, because it assumes that the 100Mbs is true 4K, which will look like crap on a big 4K TV, if they compress it the same as a 1080p upload. I notice a clear difference after making the output rendering change to 100Mbs CBR for upload to YouTube. It is more likely to freeze up, too, on playback, if the YouTube buffering stream can't keep up, at busy viewing times! Also, YouTube outputs multiple quality versions of 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 1440p, and 2160p from a 2160p 4K upload. Only by selecting the 2160p Quality setting will you get the best stream. The YouTube default Auto quality setting is often only playing the crappy 720p feed, even though 2160p is available, if you select it manually first!![]()
1080p version. Size of my uploaded file: 620 MB. Size of file on YouTube: 136 MB
2160p version. Size of my uploaded file: 1889 MB (3x the size of the 1080p video). Size of file on YouTube: 143 MB (not a typo... only 7 MB larger than the 1080p version of the same video).