Speak for yourself my friend, not for the masses.I was wrong you guys aren’t pilots at least not responsible ones!
Speak for yourself my friend, not for the masses.I was wrong you guys aren’t pilots at least not responsible ones!
So if the consensus is that the drone hit the tower, private property and I’ve seen no comments on this is shocking.I think the consensus is that it did hit the tower.
Not your friend and I think I do speak for legal pilots.Speak for yourself my friend, not for the masses.
Well, that would have been OT. The OP was asking what happened to his Phantom. He wasn't asking for us to school him on the law.So if the consensus is that the drone hit the tower, private property and I’ve seen no comments on this is shocking.
Your profile says you’ve been a member since sept 2015. If you’ve been lurking that long then you should have seen the countless threads with the judgmental posts you seek on this type of flying. If you haven’t, spend a little time looking around the forum and you’ll find plenty.So if the consensus is that the drone hit the tower, private property and I’ve seen no comments on this is shocking.
For the "masses" of us who do follow FAA and AMA guidelines, this was an unfair statement and uncalled for in relation to this thread. See post #44 for clarification.Not your friend and I think I do speak for legal pilots.
I haven’t been lurking, and your right I’m not going to impose my flying habits on this fellow that lost his drone. Sorry I’ll try and be more neutral.Your profile says you’ve been a member since sept 2015. If you’ve been lurking that long then you should have seen the countless threads with the judgmental posts you seek on this type of flying. If you haven’t, spend a little time looking around the forum and you’ll find plenty.
Another "no" should be added to the original comments ... "Dead, nothing, no signal, no GPS, no last known location". It was NO VLOS. One less drone flown by an operator who feels normal safety guidelines don't apply. That might be a good thing.
Personally feel this comment was uncalled for...
"operator who feels normal safety guidelines don't apply"
Was good learning experience for this pilot to take a second look at altitude, rth settings and when to abort mission on first signs of potentially critical warnings.
If this was a water tower flight in a some what rural area. Not metro city where no regard for pubic safety.
Some are really quick to pass judgement yet they be judged... Live by the sword die by the sword mindset to the right and total idiots with no regard to other on the left.
Did anyone ever thing all this data is being used for future autonomous flight. Without human error none of this could be possible.
Best wishes to the pilot and I certainly hope you continue your journey.
The left landing skid was slightly damaged when i received it and I ignored the compass error/controller announcing i was in ATTI mode.
Live by the sword die by the sword are you talking about Bruce Willis?
Yes thanks for the Bible study. Not sure how it fits here.
Live by the sword die by the sword are you talking about Bruce Willis?
Ok I was wondering where that came from.He was simply answering your question:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.