Can you comment as to why you think that it's more versatile? I can see the redundancy case because of the extra motors, but I feel that their integrated screen and OS makes it less versatile, kind of like the P4P+. There are certainly a lot more apps, utilities, and accessories available for the P4P. Just curious.If you are serious about mapping it is a much more versatile and redundant platform
While it is an integrated screen it is not quite sandboxed like the P4+ and RTK controllers. It is capable of running DataPilot (their native flight planner), SiteScan and Pix4D. I am working with DroneDeploy, but it is just in process. The camera configuration is a big plus as well. There is the E50, E90 and E10T (thermal) that are all hot-swappable. The landing gear retracts and the camera can yaw 360d with an unobstructed view because of the retractable landing gear. It also gets about 5 minutes more flight time and mapping with the E90 can run faster during a mission than a P4P.Can you comment as to why you think that it's more versatile? I can see the redundancy case because of the extra motors, but I feel that their integrated screen and OS makes it less versatile, kind of like the P4P+. There are certainly a lot more apps, utilities, and accessories available for the P4P. Just curious.
Does DataPilot offer terrain following? Their website says that it's offered, but doesn't provide details. The E90 looks like it's about the same sensor size as the P4P (1") and I wouldn't want to go smaller. It's certainly a more expensive option than the P4P, but cheaper than the I2 or M200 (with an X4S camera, if you can find one).DataPilot (their native flight planner), SiteScan and Pix4D
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.